Contents
- Child & Youth Mental Health
- Mental Health Service Delivery System
- If You Need Help
- Preventing Youth Suicide
- FRIENDS for Life
- The Maples
- Resources
- Initiatives
- Mental Health Service Delivery System
Suicide risk assessment represents the cornerstone of effective therapeutic work with suicidal youth. While several suicide risk assessment instruments and scales are available, several of these scales generate a high number of “false positives” and should never be used alone or as a substitute for a thorough clinical assessment.
The best strategy is to develop a comprehensive, systematic and collaborative approach to assessing suicide risk that considers empirically validated risk factors and incorporates clinical knowledge and judgment. Examples of suicide risk assessment tools can be found under the “At-a-Glance Tools”.
The purpose of a comprehensive suicide risk assessment is to estimate the risk for suicidal behaviour based on a careful weighing of the clinically relevant risk and protective factors. In general, the greater the number of risk factors and the fewer the protective factors, the more elevated the risk for potential suicide and suicidal behaviour. Youth who have a number of risk factors (e.g. depression and substance abuse) and who have a previous history of suicidal behaviour and report having current and specific thoughts of suicide should be considered at high risk.
Most approaches to suicide risk assessment underscore the importance of systematically eliciting information across a number of key domains.42 43
In addition, ongoing attention should be paid to the current level of suicidal intent (i.e. desire for death), reasons for suicide, and issues of lethality. A consideration of the young person’s level of engagement and willingness to follow through with treatment recommendations is also highly recommended.
One way to approach a comprehensive suicide risk assessment is to use a series of broad categories to guide your questioning and systematic inquiry. This, and other similar approaches, can also be adapted to provide the structure for your clinical record-keeping. For example:
When assessing risk for suicide in pre-pubertal children, consider the following:44
Sample Questions to Ask Young Children About Suicide45
After a careful weighing of risk and protective factors, clinicians then need to estimate the current level of suicide risk. Clients are typically placed in one of the following risk categories or zones: none, low, moderate, high or imminent46. The estimation of risk is both science and art and experienced clinicians recognize the importance of attending to the whole person, understanding suicide risk within a dynamic context, and being thorough and persistent in eliciting specific information. Five key cautions are worth noting:
The treatment plan developed by the clinician needs to correspond to the estimated level of risk. At a minimum, a treatment plan needs to address the following, all of which should be documented in the clinical record:47
Maintaining a clear record that documents the risk assessment, estimation of risk, approach to safety planning, treatment goals, and clinical consultations is an important aspect of good clinical care. Documentation is important for the following reasons:48
Despite the additional time burden involved in adequately documenting a suicide risk assessment, out-patient clinicians are strongly encouraged to document their suicide risk assessment and treatment plans immediately following clinical evaluation of the client.49 Overly simplistic “yes/no” tickable boxes (i.e. Is the client suicidal?) and subjective rating scales (from 1 to 5) are generally poor substitutes for a thorough risk assessment and a step-by-step account of subsequent clinical judgment and planning.
In out-patient settings, documentation of suicide risk should be undertaken as follows:50
To summarize, key principles to keep in mind when assessing risk for youth suicide include:
For additional resources on risk assessment, click here.